Ammonium hydroxide solution

Request or contribute your recipes here. You can also try doing a search, as there are some old recipe posts which have not or cannot be moved over to this forum.
Post Reply
Zoe D
Posts: 5
Joined: 08 Oct 2015, 09:59
State/Location: NSW

Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by Zoe D »

Hi guys,

I am trying to make a 1 M solution of ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) from a 25% stock solution. My problem is that every reference I come across (The Laboratory, various chemistry sites online) says that the molecular weight of the compound should be 35.1, yet the bottle I have states that the M.W. is 77.08. Why is there a difference and should I trust the bottle or not? The bottle is from Silform and is labelled Ammonia solution 25% tech. It then has the formula NH4OH.

Zoe
User avatar
Whspa
Posts: 345
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 10:00
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by Whspa »

Ammonium acetate has the molecular weight of 77.08.
I wouldn't trust the bottle. I've bought chemicals from Silform before and they've been wrongly labelled.
Try contacting Silform for their advice.
User avatar
Labbie
Posts: 3366
Joined: 28 Nov 2006, 10:00
Job Title: Retired
Suburb: At Home
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by Labbie »

Ammonium Hydroxide is Ammonia page 35 from csis The Lab book page 11 tells us Ammonia is 17.0 Is that any help.
Regards Labbie

Lab Manager/Lab Tech, mind reading etc etc
Now retired :wub:
Zoe D
Posts: 5
Joined: 08 Oct 2015, 09:59
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by Zoe D »

Hmm, the plot thickens. I think I will try contacting Silform...

Thanks.
User avatar
fibreweb
Posts: 620
Joined: 20 Jul 2006, 10:00
School: Oxley High School
Suburb: Tamworth
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by fibreweb »

In my recipe book I have dilution figures for Ammonia at different percentages to make 1M.
From memory I sourced this information from reliable sources many years ago when I made up my table.
10% 178ml reagent/822 water for a litre volume
18% 105 ml/895 water
25% 75ml/925 water
28% 68ml/932 water
35% 55ml/945 water.
I also have a note that I wrote stating that different sources of reference may have slightly different figures, however for the purposes of school chemistry these very slight differences do not matter.
labbassistant
Posts: 75
Joined: 18 Aug 2021, 09:33
Job Title: Labbie
School: Wollongong High School
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by labbassistant »

Hi all,
I'm a little confused with ammonia...
We have some droppers labelled Ammonia solution 0.1m, and then we have ammonium hydroxide solution 0.1m.
I was having a google and I'm not 100% sure but is ammonia the same as ammonium hydroxide? Or is ammonia the gas and ammonium hydroxide the solution?
Should I be relabeling?
Help! Thanks in advance
ottenc
Posts: 38
Joined: 25 Mar 2022, 09:42
Job Title: Laboratory Technician
School: Leighland Christian School
State/Location: TAS

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by ottenc »

labbassistant wrote: 12 Dec 2022, 08:39 Hi all,
I'm a little confused with ammonia...
We have some droppers labelled Ammonia solution 0.1m, and then we have ammonium hydroxide solution 0.1m.
I was having a google and I'm not 100% sure but is ammonia the same as ammonium hydroxide? Or is ammonia the gas and ammonium hydroxide the solution?
Should I be relabeling?
Help! Thanks in advance
Any diluted solution of ammonia is ammonium hydroxide. A bottle can be labelled with either, and programs like RiskAssess just list it as ammonia. As long as you are aware they are the same thing and can provide it no matter how the teachers ask for it, feel free to label it however you please :thumbup:
labbassistant
Posts: 75
Joined: 18 Aug 2021, 09:33
Job Title: Labbie
School: Wollongong High School
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by labbassistant »

ottenc wrote: 12 Dec 2022, 10:42
labbassistant wrote: 12 Dec 2022, 08:39 Hi all,
I'm a little confused with ammonia...
We have some droppers labelled Ammonia solution 0.1m, and then we have ammonium hydroxide solution 0.1m.
I was having a google and I'm not 100% sure but is ammonia the same as ammonium hydroxide? Or is ammonia the gas and ammonium hydroxide the solution?
Should I be relabeling?
Help! Thanks in advance
Any diluted solution of ammonia is ammonium hydroxide. A bottle can be labelled with either, and programs like RiskAssess just list it as ammonia. As long as you are aware they are the same thing and can provide it no matter how the teachers ask for it, feel free to label it however you please :thumbup:
Amazing! Thank you so much!!
bigmack
Posts: 1159
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 10:49
Job Title: Lab Technician
School: FCAC
State/Location: QLD

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by bigmack »

I had to make some 0.1M Ammonia solution .Our stock bottle is labeled 25% Ammonia .
I gotta say I am also totally confused .
I first tried Merck Acid/base calculator which includes Ammonium Hydroxide .
It was well until I scrolled down to where they base their calculations .They mention 28% Ammonia they sell is actually 56.5%ammoniam Hydroxide so that got me thinking that the too aren't the same thing . Am I making 0.1M ammonia solution or Ammonium Hydroxide solution ?
What is the 25% stock solution , Ammonia or Ammonium Hydroxide?
Is it 25% W/W or W/V ?

I did some googling and even looked here and now I am completely confused .
Seems everyone has a different opinion on it . There are forums of University boffins that are arguing .some say 25% is 14.7M , another says its 13.something .
It's all way above my pay grade . :-(
I just want to make a solution .

fibreweb wrote: 16 Feb 2016, 13:34 In my recipe book I have dilution figures for Ammonia at different percentages to make 1M.
From memory I sourced this information from reliable sources many years ago when I made up my table.
10% 178ml reagent/822 water for a liter volume
18% 105 ml/895 water
25% 75ml/925 water
28% 68ml/932 water
35% 55ml/945 water.
I also have a note that I wrote stating that different sources of reference may have slightly different figures, however for the purposes of school chemistry these very slight differences do not matter.
That would mean 7.5ml made up to 1Litre for 0.1M


One online answer is this . It is saying use 15.41mls of 25% made up to 1Litre for 0.1M
https://askfilo.com/user-question-answe ... 3538353236

Google AI calculates it as 6.8ml made up to 1 liter
based on 25% ammonia having a molarity of 14.7Mol/L
From here
https://www.vedantu.com/question-answer ... 56229a534f.

I'm buggered if I know how to do it :crazy:
Marama T
Posts: 334
Joined: 01 Aug 2017, 12:19
Job Title: Laboratory technician
School: College
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by Marama T »

Ammonium hydroxide is ammonia in water. Give yourself a break bigmack and just use the Merck calculator.
bigmack
Posts: 1159
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 10:49
Job Title: Lab Technician
School: FCAC
State/Location: QLD

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by bigmack »

Marama T wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 10:23 Ammonium hydroxide is ammonia in water. Give yourself a break bigmack and just use the Merck calculator.
I realize that Ammonia in water is Ammonium Hydroxide and often called Ammonia.
This is the problem Marama, the default values in the Merck calculator say this when I use it .
(All I added was 1000mls and 0.1Molarity ).
Ammonia calculator.png
This is what it says about the 28% verses 56.6%
Ammonia description.png
So if I change the 56.6% to 25% , I get this .
It is now telling me that the Molarity of the 25% is only 6.419 M when everywhere else suggests that it is 14.7 M
Ammonia 25%.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
bigmack
Posts: 1159
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 10:49
Job Title: Lab Technician
School: FCAC
State/Location: QLD

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by bigmack »

Thinking about this some more .
Looking at Merck calculator that they base on their 28% product . They say 6.88ml per litre .

When I look back at Fibrewebs post , it also says 6.8ml per litre iff’n it was 0.1m from 28%

So I am confident that Fibrewebs 7.5mls for 25% would be pretty close to the mark .

Incidentally , I did make up the solution using the 28% figure from Merck yesterday and the prac was done . Haven’t heard back [-o<
Marama T
Posts: 334
Joined: 01 Aug 2017, 12:19
Job Title: Laboratory technician
School: College
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by Marama T »

I found this very confusing too. I relabelled all our "ammonia" with "ammonium hydroxide" just to make things clearer.
RosalieL
Posts: 816
Joined: 28 Jan 2021, 13:24
Job Title: Lab Assistant
School: MCS
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by RosalieL »

I think it's like when you have copper sulfate anhydrous which is 159.6g/mol but copper sulfate pentahydrate is 249.68g/mol. If you make up a 5% solution of copper sulfate anhydrous by weight (5g CuSO4/95gH2O) you will have a different molarity compared to a 5% solution of pentahydrate (5gCuSO4.5H2O/95gH2O).

So with the "ammonia", only the concentration of ammonia NH3 is being considered but "ammonium hydroxide" is counting all the oxygen molecules making the NH4+ and OH- ions, so it's a higher percentage of the solution. Your first calculation screenshot would be correct.
Marama T
Posts: 334
Joined: 01 Aug 2017, 12:19
Job Title: Laboratory technician
School: College
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by Marama T »

Did you find out how the prac went bigmack?
Marama T
Posts: 334
Joined: 01 Aug 2017, 12:19
Job Title: Laboratory technician
School: College
State/Location: NSW

Re: Ammonium hydroxide solution

Post by Marama T »

I went searching online and hit the same problem - different molarities for 25% based on whether they were using the molecular weight of ammonia or ammonium hydroxide in their calculations. Check out the different molarities on this page
https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q= ... ve&ssui=on
It's a fabulous conundrum worthy of further investigation. Thanks for making my brain hurt (again) bigmack.
Post Reply